Author’s Note

It is very easy to forget to that the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) is the sole base for adjudicating all kinds of civil disputes.

The Civil Procedure Code is super important in India. It’s like a master key for lawyers because once they understand it well, they can handle all kinds of civil cases smoothly.

Its like, the Civil Procedure Code is buddies with lots of other laws like the Indian Contract Act, Industrial Disputes Act, and more. All of these other civil laws look up to the Civil Procedure Code for guidance on how to handle legal procedures.

A competent lawyer should be able to determine whether the Civil Procedure Code applies to a specific dispute or adjudicating body (such as courts, redressal commissions, tribunals, etc.) or not. This allows the lawyer to prepare for the case in due time and according to the correct applicable laws.

History of CPC

The Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 5 of 1908), which in common practice is used in its abbreviated form i.e., C.P.C, is a pre-independence enactment.
 

The Code has undergone numerous amendments. It was amended more than 30 times during 1909- 1976. It was amended in 1999 and 2002 vide the Court of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999, and the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002.

The Act was first enacted in the year 1859 as Act No.8 of 1859.

The Code was, thereafter, amended several times in the years, 1860, 1861, 1878, 1879, and 1882.

After facing these many amendments, finally, the Code of Civil Procedure was re-enacted in the year 1908, and it came into force with effect from 1 January 1909. It further underwent a revamp by virtue of a major amendment in the year 1976.

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Under Section 9

Section 9 of the CPC is like a big umbrella that covers most civil cases. It says that civil courts have the power to handle most civil cases unless other laws specifically say otherwise. So, unless other laws say a case is not for them, civil courts can take care of it.

This rule is super important because it helps decide where arguments should be settled. It makes sure that fairness and justice happen in the best way and in the right place.

Section 9 of the CPC says,

“The Courts shall (subject to the provisions herein contained) have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred.”

Res Sub Judice and Fairness in Legal Proceedings

Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (1908) talks about Res sub judice, which means “under judgment” in Latin.

If parties are already arguing about something in one court, another court can’t start dealing with the same problem. This is to make sure things are fair and not confusing.

Oversimplification –  If a case is already being decided somewhere, you can’t start the same case in another court. It’s about fairness and making sure everyone follows the same rules. However, new cases can be instituted between the same parties before another court if the subject matter of the dispute is clearly and reasonably different. Section 10 says,

“No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in [India] have jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of 1[India] established or continued by [the Central Government .] and having like jurisdiction, or before [the Supreme Court].”

Wide Application of CPC over other Statutes & Procedures

The relevance of CPC extends beyond civil litigation, permeating diverse legal domains such as family law, consumer protection, contract law, insolvency proceedings, and more.

The CPC has been drafted with the intent to support the procedures of other courts, tribunals and adjudication bodies.

The provisions of the CPC independently support many statutes in relation to procedures of evidence, examination, summons and witness etc.

From ensuring fair treatment of parties in matrimonial disputes to empowering consumer forums with adjudicatory powers akin to civil courts, CPC’s applicability is far-reaching and multifaceted.

Navigating the Connection Between CPC, Family Courts, and Hindu Marriage Act

Section 2(e) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 states that any terms not defined within this Act but defined in the Code of Civil Procedure will have the same meanings as assigned to them in that Code.

In simple terms, if there are any words or expressions used in this Act that you’re unsure about, you can look them up in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to understand what they mean. Section 2(e) says,

“All other words and expressions used but not defined in this Act and defined in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Code.”

Section 21 of the Hindu Marriage Act says that the rules for dealing with cases under this Act should mostly follow the Civil Procedure Code of 1908.

When dealing with Hindu marriage disputes, it’s important to follow the rules in the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), unless the Hindu Marriage Act or the High Court says differently. This helps keep things fair and consistent in legal proceedings.

Family disputes are sorted out in family courts under the Hindu Marriage Act, and The Family Court often uses the same rules as the CPC.

In simple terms, if there are any words or expressions used in this Act that you’re unsure about, you can look them up in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to understand what they mean.

In simple words, this section makes sure that the court procedures in cases before Family Courts dealing with Hindu marriages stick to the guidelines in the Civil Procedure Code, making it easier to solve problems and handle cases.

“Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act and to such rules as the High Court may make in this behalf, all proceedings under this Act shall be regulated, as far as may be, by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.”

Specialized Applications: CPC in Consumer Protection Act

Ever wondered how Consumer Redressal Commissions operate? They’re actually guided by the same procedures outlined in the CPC. CPC’s reach extends beyond traditional civil litigation to specialized areas like consumer protection.

The consumer court has the power to call witnesses, ask for evidence, and handle legal stuff properly, same as the Civil Procedure Code. It’s like giving them the right tools to do their job well.

The Consumer Protection Act of 1986 under section (38(9)) gives district commissions similar powers to regular courts under the CPC. These powers enable the District Commission to ensure fair and effective resolution of consumer disputes.

The District Commissions can summon and compel the presence of defendants and witnesses, take testimony under oath, and request the presentation of documents or physical evidence.

Additionally, the district commission has the authority to accept evidence in the form of affidavits and obtain reports from relevant laboratories or sources for analysis. The District Commission can also issue commissions to examine witnesses or documents when necessary.

Furthermore, the Central Government may prescribe additional matters within the Commission’s jurisdiction. These powers equip the District Commission to handle consumer complaints efficiently, ensuring justice for consumers while upholding legal standards. Section 38(9) of Consumer Protection Act says,

“For the purposes of this section, the District Commission shall have the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:-–

(a) the summoning and enforcing the attendance of any defendant or witness and examining the witness on oath;

(b) requiring the discovery and production of any document or other material object as evidence;

(c) receiving of evidence on affidavits;

(d) the requisitioning of the report of the concerned analysis or test from the appropriate laboratory or from any other relevant source;

(e) issuing of commissions for the examination of any witness, or document; and

(f) any other matter which may be prescribed by the Central Government.”

CPC’s Relevance in Contract Law

When a contract is breached, the parties involved look to the terms of the contract itself for guidance on what to do next. These terms outline how to seek compensation or enforce performance. Clauses like Governing Law, Dispute Resolution, and Jurisdiction clarify where and how disputes will be resolved. Parties can choose arbitration or civil courts for resolution. Breaching a contract obligates the offending party to compensate the other. Exclusive Jurisdiction clauses specify the court for legal proceedings, but they don’t automatically include all courts. They’re subject to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), which states that courts have jurisdiction over civil suits unless restricted. The CPC also specifies factors determining court jurisdiction, such as the defendant’s residence or where the issue arose. Understanding these legal details helps parties navigate contract disputes efficiently.

Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code basically gives courts the power to deal with different civil cases, including those about contracts. If a lawyer understands this code well, they can help make sure contracts are followed correctly in legal situations. Section 9 of The Indian Contract Act says,

“The Courts shall (subject to the provisions herein contained) have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred.”

CPC’s Influence on Intellectual Property Disputes

Copyright: It  is like a special permission for the owners of ideas or creations. It’s the right to control who can make copies of their work. So, only the original creators and anyone they say can make copies are allowed to do so.

In copyright disputes, district courts have the power to deal with cases where someone copies someone else’s work without permission.

Section 62 of the Indian copyright Act explains how district courts handle these cases, showing how the law and copyright rules fit together. Section 62 says,

“Jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this Chapter.—Every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this Chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this Act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction.

For the purpose of sub-section (1), a “district court having jurisdiction” shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), or any other law for the time being in force, include a district court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding, the person instituting the suit or other proceeding or, where there are more than one such persons, any of them actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain.”

In the Patent Act of 1970 : Section 77 gives the Controller powers similar to those of a civil court during proceedings under the Act. This means the Controller can call people to testify, ask for documents, accept written evidence, and even set the costs involved.

If the Controller orders costs, they can be collected like a court order. This helps ensure fair handling of patent-related matters, making sure everyone follows the rules and resolves disputes properly.

To understand it you should first know about the patent – A patent is like a special permission for someone to own an invention. It means they’re the only ones who can make, use, or sell it, without anyone else exploiting it. The government gives out patents, but they only last for a certain amount of time, usually about 20 years. Every country has different IPR laws.

The Central Government has the authority to appoint examiners and other officers with suitable designations for the controller. Section 77(1) of The Patent Act says,

“In section 77(1)Subject to any rules made in this behalf, the Controller in any proceedings before him under this Act shall have the powers of a civil court while trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), in respect of the following matters, namely:—

(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath; (b) requiring the discovery and production of any document;

(c) receiving evidence on affidavits;

(d) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;

(e) awarding costs;

(f) reviewing his own decision on application made within the prescribed time and in the prescribed manner;

(g) setting aside an order passed ex- parte on application made within the prescribed time and in the prescribed manner;

(h) any other matter which may be prescribed.

(2) Any order for costs awarded by the Controller in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under sub-section (1) shall be executable as a decree of a civil court.” 

In The Trade Marks Act of 1999:  Section 127(a) and (b). It gives the Registrar certain powers when dealing with things under this Act.

The Registrar has the authority to obtain evidence, administer oaths to ensure truthfulness, summon witnesses, and request documents, mirroring the procedures outlined in the Civil Procedure Code.

Also, the Registrar can decide on costs, which are like fines that people have to pay. But, there are some cases where the Registrar can’t give costs, like when it’s about certain types of trademarks. And, if someone doesn’t agree with what the Registrar decides, they can ask the Registrar to take another look at it. These rules are there to make sure things about trademarks are sorted out fairly and quickly.

A trademark is like a special sign that helps tell one company’s stuff apart from another company’s stuff. It’s like a label that shows who made something. Trademarks are protected by laws that keep people from copying them

“ Powers of Registrar—In all proceedings under this Act before the Registrar,—

(a) the Registrar shall have all the powers of a civil court for the purposes of receiving evidence, administering oaths, enforcing the attendance of witnesses, compelling the discovery and production of documents and issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses;

(b) the Registrar may, subject to any rules made in this behalf under section 157, make such orders as to costs as he considers reasonable, and any such order shall be executable as a decree of a civil court.”

CPC Facilitating Insolvency Proceedings

When it comes to dealing with bankruptcy and insolvency, it’s important to understand how different laws work together.

You should know about how the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) fits into the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Act of 2016.

This act was made to make the process of dealing with insolvency smoother and to manage assets better when a company is in trouble. It’s a big deal because it changes how things work when a company can’t pay its debts.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) is the authority that oversees insolvency matters in India, including Insolvency Professional Agencies (IPA), Insolvency Professionals (IP), and Information Utilities (IU). Established on October 1, 2016, through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code passed by Lok Sabha on May 5, 2016, IBBI has legal powers. This Code covers various entities like individuals, companies, LLPs, and partnership firms, aiming to speed up the resolution of financial stress in the country. It aims to simplify insolvency procedures and manages cases through two tribunals: NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) and Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The impact spreads to everyone involved, including creditors, the company itself and individual, partnership firms, etc. When the Board operates according to this Code, IBC can do things similar to what a Civil Court does under the Civil Procedure Code of 1908.

Moreover, very often analogies are written in CPC : The Court of National Company Law Tribunal, Cuttack Bench  In the matter of Growel Feeds Pvt. Ltd. versus  Ashadeep Aquaculture Pvt. Ltd. held that In the IBC 2016 or in NCLT Rules 2076 there is no provision available to grant liberty to restore the finally disposed of petition as settled out of court or as withdrawn. Not only in IBC, 2016 there is no such provision available in any other Act, in this situation it is better to see the provisions available in Code of Civil Procedure,1908. Of course, CPC is not applicable to the proceedings under IBC, 2016 but an analogy enshrined in Code of Civil Procedure 1908 can be applied. Section 196(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code says,

“Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, while exercising the powers under this Code, the Board shall have the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters, namely:—

(i) the discovery and production of books of account and other documents, at such place and such time as may be specified by the Board;

(ii) summoning and enforcing the attendance of persons and examining them on oath;

(iii) inspection of any books, registers and other documents of any person at any place;

(iv) issuing of commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents.”

CPC’s Potential Impact on The Industrial Disputes Act

The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 is all about keeping peace at work. It tells us how to solve problems in workplaces.

According to section 11(3) of this Act, those responsible for handling these disputes are vested with powers akin to Civil Courts under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court has the authority to summon parties involved in the dispute, obtain relevant documents, and conduct inquiries to ensure equitable resolution of employment-related matters.

“Section 11(3) Every Board, Court, [Labour Court, Tribunal and National Tribunal] shall have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), when trying a suit, in respect of the following matters, namely:—

(a) enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;

(b) compelling the production of documents and material objects;

(c) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses;

(d) in respect of such other matters as may be prescribed.”

Influence of the Civil Procedure Code on the Information Technology Act

Under section 46(5) of the IT Act, 2000, it is stipulated that every adjudicating officer, when handling matters pertaining to the Act, is endowed with the same powers as a civil court.

These powers are akin to those vested in the Appellate Tribunal under section 58(2) of the same Act, which correspond to the powers granted to a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908). These powers enable them to summon individuals and administer oaths, request documents or electronic records, accept written statements as evidence, appoint someone to examine witnesses or documents, review decisions, and issue rulings in case of non-appearance in court.

This provision ensures that adjudicating officers have the necessary authority to effectively address matters arising under the IT Act, 2000, and maintain fairness and justice in their proceedings.

In the Information Technology Act of 2000, Section 48 concerns the establishment of specialized courts known as Cyber Appellate Tribunals, also referred to as the Cyber Regulations Appellate Tribunal. These tribunals are established by the Central Government through official notification. Primarily tasked with resolving legal issues in the digital realm, the government determines the commencement and jurisdiction of these tribunals, thereby outlining their operational framework for clarity and transparency.

“Section 58(2) The  [Appellate Tribunal] shall have, for the purposes of discharging its functions under this Act, the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters, namely:–

(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;

(b) requiring the discovery and production of documents or other electronic records;

(c) receiving evidence on affidavits;

(d) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;

(e) reviewing its decisions;

(f) dismissing an application for default or deciding it ex parte;

(g) any other matter which may be prescribed.”

Conclusion: Empower Your Legal Journey

Mastering the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) isn’t just about understanding legal procedures; it’s about safeguarding your rights across various legal domains. From contract disputes to family law matters, consumer protection to intellectual property rights, and insolvency proceedings to industrial disputes, the CPC’s influence is pervasive. It serves as the backbone for legal proceedings outlined in statutes such as the Indian Contract Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Family Courts Act, Consumer Protection Act, Copyright Act, Patents Act, Trademarks Act, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and Information Technology Act. Understanding the CPC ensures fairness, efficiency, and adherence to legal standards in every legal proceeding. Ready to navigate the complexities of civil litigation with confidence? Reach out for personalized legal guidance and embark on a journey to protect what matters most.

Call to Action: Empower Your Legal Journey

Ready to navigate the complexities of civil litigation with confidence?

Reach out to us for legal guidance. Whether you have questions about CPC, family law, intellectual property rights, or any other legal matter, our team is here to provide clarity and support.

Contact us today to protect what matters most.